WebSee Austin v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547 (1994); Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993). 5 The Board is obligated to reexamine the evidence and conduct a critical examination of the justification for its previous decision. Fletcher v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 394, 397 (1991). If the Court grants this motion, the Board shall obtain WebBrown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993), and the "fair process" principle underlying the Thurber decision. Because the Board Medical Adviser's opinion was not supportive of the veteran's present claim, reliance on that opinion would be prejudicial to the veteran.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR …
http://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/Castellano_09-3386_published_opinion_12-22-2011.pdf WebThurber v. Brown May 14, 1993 5 Vet. App ... Marciniak v. Brown April 21, 1997 10 Vet. App. 198 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · United States. Moffitt v. Brown April 29, 1997 10 Vet. App. 214 ... make chess board
Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 119 (1993): Case Brief Summary
WebAppellant's Br. at 4-5; see id. at 6 (citing Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993)). The Secretary disputes these contentions and urges the Court to uphold § 20.1304(a) as … WebOct 27, 2024 · Brown, 4 Vet.App. 384, 392-94 (1993)); In Smith, this Court held that the principle of fair process applies throughout the process of evidentiary development and is implicated when “the Board fails to procure a medical opinion in ‘an impartial, unbiased, and neutral manner’ when the opinion request contains a Board member’s own negative … http://www.bva.va.gov/docs/VLR_VOL4/AuthorsCopies6-Bunker-Finn-Lehman.PDF make chess set